SCP
I-Search
Paper Rubric
Name:
Date: |
Evaluation Panel:
Advisor: |
Essential Question: |
Exceptional = Pass (90 –
100) Satisfactory =
Pass (70 – 89) Unsatisfactory
= Redo (0 – 69)
Assessment Summary: If any of the criteria below are missing,
incomplete, or below standard, the I-Search paper will be considered incomplete
and will not be eligible for evaluation until completed/brought to standard.
Note: Anything which impedes readability or gets in the way
of understanding, such as frequency of errors or ineffective organization, will
automatically qualify as a re-do. The original and the rubric MUST be submitted
along with the corrected paper.
Please indicate what
needs to be completed/re-done in order for the student to pass.
Formatting and Conventions 30 Points
Criteria |
Points Possible |
Points Earned |
Comments |
Formatting per instructions ·
8 -10 pages
2000 – 2500 words ·
Double spacing ·
12 point Times New
Roman or Arial ·
1 inch margins
all round Note: Photos, graphics, the précis, outline, table of
contents, annotated bibliography, and appendix do not count toward the total
page count |
|
|
Formatting is a basic
requirement. If it is not correct, the paper will be automatically handed
back to be redone. Satisfactory will be the highest level of achievement
possible for the redo. |
Annotated Bibliography ·
10 Sources o At least 2 primary sources o At least 2 related books o At least 10 references appear properly cited within
the body of the paper ·
MLA Format o Must include a 75-word annotation with each source
listed. Annotations include a brief description of content and a comment upon
the usefulness of the resource Note: A
Satisfactory paper will have 1 or more citations per page; an Exceptional
paper will have 2 or more citations per page |
10 |
|
|
Conventions – Mechanical
Correctness ·
Spelling (no
misspellings or capitalization errors) |
5 |
|
|
·
Punctuation
(correct use of end marks, commas, quotation marks, dashes, colons,
semicolons. . .) |
5 |
|
|
·
Sentence
structure (use of complete sentences, lack of comma splice errors and
run-on’s; use of parallel structure where appropriate, modifiers not
misplaced, etc.) |
5 |
|
|
·
Usage (use of
the correct word in the correct circumstance, agreement of pronouns and
antecedents in standard, informal English) |
5 |
|
|
To assess this section
ask, “How much work would a copy editor need to do to prepare this piece for
publication?” |
|||
Content, Organization,
Style
70 Points |
|||
Criteria |
Points Possible |
Points Earned |
Comments |
Content: Introduction: ·
What I knew (or
didn’t know) about the topic ·
Why I chose the
topic (the essential question) Body: ·
The journey or
the search ·
Includes
primary research with sources cited with in the paper and listed in the
annotated bibliography ·
Includes
secondary research with sources cited with in the paper and listed in the
annotated bibliography ·
Includes
illustrative details that are specific and precise Conclusion: ·
What I learned
(or didn’t learn) |
30 |
|
|
Organization: ·
The
introduction catches the audience’s attention and makes them want to read
more. ·
The journey is
presented in the best possible order and with the appropriate amount of time/attention
is paid to each section – logical paragraphing and emphasis ·
Moves from
section to section in ways that make reading enjoyable – transitions link
ideas between and within paragraphs |
20 |
|
|
Style: ·
Narrative form ·
First person
point of view ·
Writing makes
the audience care about the topic ·
Writing is as
unique as the person who wrote it ·
The author
respects who the audience is and what they need to know ·
Writing is
energetic and expressive ·
The language is
specific and precise to the needs of the paper ·
There is a
variety of sentence types. |
20 |
|
|
Points earned ______/100
Comments: